Explore sustainable development practices along the Silk Road, which seek to balance economic growth with environmental protection. These practices are essential for the well-being of the communities that depend on this region's resources.
BRINGING SUSTAINABLE BLUE ECONOMY PRINCIPLES TO THE ARCTIC
OUTSIDE INTERESTS: CHINA'S ARCTIC POLICY
Countries outside the Arctic states are showing a growing interest in Arctic resources.
China is a key actor: it became a member of the Arctic Council in 2013, and in early 2018, the Chinese government published a white paper laying out its Arctic policy for the coming years. "The future of the Arctic," the paper concludes, "concerns the interests of the Arctic States, the well-being of non-Arctic States and that of the humanity as a whole." China was also very clear in its expectation that it will play a major role in the Arctic’s future:
The governance of the Arctic requires the participation and contribution of all stakeholders. On the basis of the principles of’respect, cooperation, win-win result and sustainability’, China, as a responsible major country, is ready to cooperate with all relevant parties to seize the historic opportunity in the development of the Arctic, to address the challenges brought by the changes in the region, to jointly understand, protect, develop and participate in the governance of the Arctic, and advance Arctic-related cooperation under the Belt and Road Initiative, so as to build a community with a shared future for mankind and contribute to peace, stability and sustainable development in the Arctic.1*0 The white paper goes on to underscore that the melting ice and gradually changing conditions in the Arctic will encourage "the commercial use of sea routes and develop-ment of resources in the region." It also explicitly makes the link between China’s 'Veit and Road Initiative" - a massive international development process with a special focus on infrastructure - and the Arctic shipping routes, noting the "opportunities for parties concerned to jointly build a ’Polar Silk Road’, and facilitate connectivity and sustainable economic and social development of the Arctic." The paper calls for "multi-level, omni-dimensional and wide-ranging cooperation in this area," through all appropriate channels, engaging all stakeholders in the stimulation of Blue Economy activity.
China is not the only non-Arctic state to vocalize its interest in further developing the region. Many countries, such as the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and France, have published polar or Arctic strategies during the last decade asserting their will to play a role in the governance of the region. Arctic states must strengthen the Arctic Council to accommodate these outside pressures and aid the integrated stimulation of the Blue Economic activity.91
Philosophy From Bulgaria
To create a ranking of countries on the need to implement the Universal Model of Sustainable Governance (UMSG) from U-model.org, I need to consider a number of factors such as economic development, political stability, social indicators and environmental sustainability. It is important to note that such grading would be subjective and dependent on different interpretations of these factors.
As I do not have an independent analysis of all countries in the world vis-à-vis the UMSG, I can only offer a general idea of which types of countries would benefit most from the implementation of the UMSG:
Developing countries with high levels of corruption and weak political stability: These countries often struggle with social and economic challenges, and the UMSG can offer frameworks for more effective governance.
Countries with rapid economic growth but low environmental sustainability: Such countries can use the UMSG to balance economic development with environmental protection.
Developed countries with strong democratic institutions but challenges in social justice: These countries can use the UMSG to improve social inclusion and reduce inequalities.
Small island states and countries with limited resources: Such countries can benefit from the UMSG for resource management and climate change adaptation.
In any case, each country has unique needs and challenges, and the implementation of the UMSG will depend on the specific context and conditions in each.